<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Research on Frugal Fitness</title><link>https://frugal.fitness/tags/research/</link><description>Recent content in Research on Frugal Fitness</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en</language><copyright>© 2026 Frugal Fitness</copyright><lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2026 22:52:06 -0400</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://frugal.fitness/tags/research/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>How Many Reps Should You Actually Do? What the Research Says</title><link>https://frugal.fitness/posts/how-many-reps-what-research-says/</link><pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://frugal.fitness/posts/how-many-reps-what-research-says/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The conventional rep-range rules have been in gym culture for decades. Low reps build strength. Moderate reps build muscle. High reps build endurance. Follow the chart and you will get the outcome you want.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The problem is that this framework is a simplification that does not hold up well under scrutiny. The research on rep ranges has advanced significantly over the past ten years, and the picture it paints is more nuanced than a three-column table.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>